Search:     Go  
The Spanish Lawyer Online
The Spanish Lawyer Online

Newsletter

Receive our monthly newsletter and stay up to date!

  Go

Learn More about our newsletter!

The Lawbird Tribune

Keeping up-to-date with Spanish Law

Nigerian Scam Warning: Brown Wilson and Easy 2 Loan Financial Company

January 27th, 2010 @ 17:01 by aflores

It has come to our attention that a fraudster under the supposed name of “Brown Wilson” is using the good name of our sister company, easy2loan SL, in a scam offering to lend money in return of a sizeable “commission”.

If you have received a letter or e-mail written in German or any other language, from someone under the name of “Brown Wilson” from Spain or anyone else, supossedly representing a company called Easy 2 Loan Financial Company, and offering you a bank loan you are being object of a fraud.

We would like to point out the following:

  1. easy2loan SL is currently not trading
  2. Following the above, our company is not offering any type of loan.
  3. No-one under the name of “Brown Wilson” works or has worked for and on behalf of easy2loan SL

If you receive any communication apparently coming from the company EASY 2 LOAN Financial Company offering you a bank loan, you should report it immediately to the nearest Police Station as it is a fraud. Do not pay any money.

Presseninformation

Achtung! Herr Brown Wilson; Easy 2 Loan Financial Company

Wir sind informiert geworden dass einer Betrüger gennant als “Brown Wilson” hat des Names unsere Firma, easy2loan SL, benutzt.  Herr Wilson leiht Geld aber man muss verschiedene Gebühren und Kosten Bezahlen.

Falls Sie einen Brief, Email oder Anruf von Brown Wilson aus Spanien bekommen und jemand sagt Sie dass Sie Darlehen aufnehmen konnen, denn ist es wahrscheinlich einer Betrug

Darauf, hinweisen wir das folgende:

1. easy2loan ist nicht Aktiv
2. Unsere Firma bietet kein Darlehen Dienst.
3. Kein Brown Wilson arbeitete jetzt oder hat nie gearbeitet bei easy2loan SL

Falls Sie irgendeine Kommunikation von Easy 2 Loan Financial Company bekommen betreffend ein Darlehes, bitte einleiten Sie sofort eine Reklamation an der Polizei, wie wiederholen dass es einer Betrug ist.

Government Reports That Smoking Will be Banned as From Next Year in Enclosed Premises

November 6th, 2009 @ 17:11 by raymundo

Just when bar and restaurant owners thought things couldn’t get any worse, given the grim financial downturn, you can always rely on the Government to prove them wrong. Mrs Trinidad Jimenez, Spain’s Health Minister, announced yesterday that smoking will be banned in all closed public venues as from the 1st January 2010.

Bar, restaurant, hotel and discotheque owners have only just finished paying off the mandatory expensive reforms to their business premises so as to segregate designated smoking and non-smoking areas in compliance with the newly passed Smoking law (law 28/2005 which came into force on the 1st January 2006). Scarcely three years ahead the Government plans to scrape it off amending this law and banning smoking all together in closed public premises. So basically these refurbishments will now become useless.

On a side note, Spain’s football league are now threatening to go on strike if the tax reform announced by the Government this week is enforced whereby top-football-earners will now be taxed at the highest tax band of 43% instead of a flat income tax rate of 24%. This had garnered Spain widespread criticism throughout Europe on grounds of unfair competition.  Hopefully this will not be the case.

I think some people may be in for a hard time next year if they like watching football or smoking or both.

56 days to go…

Express Eviction Law Passed by Congress

October 30th, 2009 @ 10:10 by raymundo

This much-anticipated law was finally approved yesterday. It amends the Civil Procedural Law, the Tenancy Act and the Commonhold Act.

The gist of this new law is as follows:

  1. Timeframe reduced to file eviction law suit down from 2 months to 1. Landlords had to imperatively wait two months of unpaid rental before they could initiate the formal eviction procedure through the civil law courts. This has now been reduced to only one month’s waiting time.
  2. Swift execution of the eviction. The judge’s ruling will suffice to execute the eviction on the day and time that is agreed. The landlord is free to agree with his non-paying tenant to condone part of the debt providing the defaulting tenant leaves the property immediately. As from the ruling, the deadline to vacate the property has to be a statutory minimum of 15 days. It may even reach one year depending on what’s agreed.
  3. The whole legal procedure is substantiated through a verbal court procedure, as per Spain’s Procedural Law (this is not a novelty). This should be faster, in theory.
  4. The landlord can now waive the statutory long-term let of 5 years. He may now include clauses within the Tenancy Agreement in which this compulsory timeframe does not apply. i.e. a clause whereby it is stipulated that the property will be needed for the landlord’s own use or for his family’s. However, if after 3 months’ time the landlord or his family have not taken possession of the property, he will be forced to re-install his ex-tenant and award him a suitable compensation to offset the expenses of the move.
  5. Changes in the Community of Owners. Commoners will have to approve by simple majority (3/5) those improvements in the community whose aim is to be ecologically-friendly i.e. improved water or energy ducts. If these improvements can be individually enjoyed by the commoners then only a vote of 1/3 is required.

Source: El Mundo newspaper.

Related blogs and articles:

Non-Paying Tenants? No Longer an Issue

October 23rd, 2009 @ 08:10 by raymundo

One of the major problems landlords face post credit crunch is the increasing number of non-paying tenants. Many landlords rely on this source of income to offset partially or wholly the mortgage repayments of the property that is being leased being forced to have them legally evicted.

In my article on “Landlord: Keys to Successful Rental Income” I pointed out that one of the best ways to avoid non-paying tenants was to take pre-emptive measures such as screening candidates carefully weeding out those with unsuitable profiles.

There is now a helpful website available that lists non-paying tenants nationwide: Fichero de Inquilinos Morosos (FIM). For a reasonable fee of only 9,95€ you will be able to search –in English- if your prospective tenant has actually defaulted previously on a Tenancy Agreement. As pointed out in my article, there are professional defaulting tenants that roam the country in search of their next victim, preying preferably on trustful non-residents. In hard times such as these, many struggling landlords cannot endure the hardship of a financial leach that eagerly exploits Tenancy laws shortcomings.

This website’s database is continuously updated with the input provided by both eviction rulings as well as by other users’ feedback. You can additionally include your own non-paying tenants in their list providing you comply and follow the online form’s instructions. Professional non-payers who’ve made a lifestyle out of it will have already been included in the list.

I think it is a useful tool that compliments nicely other tools such as rental insurance, rental bank guarantees, adding an arbitrage clause and screening out your prospective tenants. This gizmo can be used only for those candidates who’ve made it to the top of your screening list. You might as well spend a few dozen Euros now rather than having to fork out thousands at a later date. Better safe than sorry.

Related blogs and articles:

 

Pssst! Looking For Cheap Spanish Property?

October 5th, 2009 @ 13:10 by raymundo

cheap spanish propertyLook no further. We had noticed early on this year how Spanish banks had offloaded large stocks of properties from their books and funnelled them to existing or newly incorporated real estate divisions under their control, much like SIV’s. This had turned Spanish banks de facto into the largest real estate agencies. What we had also noticed, based on the failed conveyance procedures our clients had endured this year due to them being unable to secure finance, was that banks seemed to offer significantly more competitive lending terms on those properties owned by them!

This weekend I’ve read for the first time in the financial press that banks are actually offering incredible financial terms on those properties held by them:

  1. 100% Loan to Value for residents (yes, you read it right, not a typo)
  2. Euribor plus a spread of only 50 basic points (or 0,50)
  3. Timeline? Take your pick. 40, 30, 25 years; anything goes.
  4. Interest-only? Not a problem Sir. Will it be 1, 2 or 3 years?
  5. Grace period? How would you like it, Sir? 1, 2 or 3 years?
  6. Opening commission? Early redemption commissions? It’s commission-free, Sir (!)
  7. Discounts available of up to 30 and 40% off from the market’s peak in 2007. Prestigious valuers’ appraisals ready-at-hand to prove the fall in price. Take your pick.

So where’s the catch? There’s none. There’s no small writing to be gleaned. It’s a straightforward deal. Banks will make money in two manners, both on the sale and on granting a mortgage loan on the property.

Reading through the spreadsheet just left you gobsmacked. It was as if we had stepped back in time using HG Well’s time machine to the good old days of …2006. How could you possibly miss on the opportunity of buying a property through them with all the above lending terms bearing in mind the Euribor Rate is at an all-time low? Touchée, that’s exactly the point to be made.

How can developers or Estate Agencies compete against this? They cannot, it’s that simple. Banks have become the fiercest competitors in the Property Market taking no prisoners in their wake. If you request a mortgage loan on any property other than the bank’s, they will only offer you 50/70% LTV (non-residents), Euribor Rate plus a spread ranging from 0,7-1,50%, opening commissions (usually 1%), early redemption commissions, no interest-only, no grace period, no…well, you get the drift.  This is clearly a competitive advantage that, unless you are a fellow bank, you cannot hope to overcome.  

If this is not a buyer’s market, then frankly, I don’t know what is.

Llanera Will be the First Spanish Developer to Exit Receivership

September 28th, 2009 @ 14:09 by raymundo

As we had previously reported, an Administration Procedure does not equate to bankruptcy as some mistakenly repeatedly uphold. Receivership procedures in Spain are geared towards saving ailing companies which are undergoing temporary cash-flow problems. Throughout the Administration Procedure, and dependant on a Financial report drafted by experts, the Mercantile judge will rule on whether a company under administration should file or not for bankruptcy.

Developer Llanera was the first large Spanish developer to seek Creditor Protection back in 2007. It is fitting that it’s the first one to announce its clawed comeback. The Creditors’ General Meeting must ultimately give its approval tomorrow to the company’s proposal.

This is indeed welcome news for stressed creditors who are now bogged down in similar legal quagmires and have lost all hope.

Source: El Economista

Spanish Government to Raise Taxes

September 28th, 2009 @ 13:09 by raymundo

Contrary to what would seem like reasonable Fiscal Policy in the midst of a deep recession, Spain’s Government has decided it will raise its Indirect tax, Value Added Tax or VAT.

It doesn’t take a degree in Economics to realise just how, errm to put it mildly, counterproductive this is to the broad Economy, more so in Spain’s case. With Consumer Confidence plummeting in Spain it would seem the Government should strive to incentivize spending, rather than curtailing it at every opportunity. Oddly enough and contrary to popular wisdom, that is exactly what it has announced last Saturday the 26th of September.-a tax raise leaving the door ajar to future tax raises…

With Spain’s Property Industry, which has long been Spain’s driving force along with Tourism, in the doldrums, with 5 million unemployed and reportedly steadily rising to unprecedented levels unseen since the days of the II Republic (1931), with a reported stock of between 1.6 to 3 million unsold houses (both resales and new builds), with a Public Deficit spinning out of control adding 80 million Euros of debt everyday and with Consumer Spending spiralling downwards hitting fresh lows every month our Government decides that what is best needed by our countries’ ailing Economy is to …raise taxes; contradicting its much vaunted electoral promise of “lowering taxes”.

On Saturday the 26th of September it has been decided that as from next year 2010:

  1. The extended VAT of 16% is to be raised to 18%.
  2. The reduced VAT of 7% is to be raised to 8%. This is the tax that is levied on new builds (off-plans). The tax on resales remains unchanged. This is not welcome news by a struggling sector vying to unload a huge stock of unsold new build properties
  3. The super reduced VAT of 4% will remain unchanged.

One can only pray our Government will not raise even further our tax burden in such dire times. Lowering taxes is always the right path on the road to economic recovery which incentivates citizens saving and helps to attract Foreign Investments; both of which will be invested reactivating Consumer Spending which will ultimately lead to creation of new jobs, not to their destruction and the reckless public subsidizing of lost causes.

Reminder: Deadline to Join Aifos’ Creditors List Ends on September 30

September 24th, 2009 @ 16:09 by lawbird

We would like to remind all of those buying off-plan from Aifos that the deadline to submit your request to join Aifos’ creditors list ends on September 30. All of those who have not done so already please contact your solicitor as soon as possible.

You will have to forward your solicitor the following:

  • Original Private Purchase Contract signed with Aifos.
  • Original bank statements as proof of the different stage payments paid to Aifos.

Those who fail to submit the paperwork on time will be left out of the creditors list and will lose every chance of recovering anything from their deposits.

If you don’t have a solicitor who can represent you, please contact us urgently.

Spain’s Senate Petitions Government to Suppress “Floor Clauses”

September 23rd, 2009 @ 16:09 by raymundo

For those who are wondering what on earth is meant by a “Floor Clause” (Cláusula Suelo), we had already reviewed them in detail in our article 10 Common Abusive Clauses in Spanish Mortgage Loans and in Antonio’s blog post Reduction in Mortgage Repayments Limited by Floor Clause.

A ”Collar” clause is when the minimum interest rate to be repaid to your lender in a mortgage loan is capped i.e. 4,5%. So even if the Euribor rate heads below, you still have to pay the said minimum interest rate. These clauses are the very reason on why many borrowers are not benefitting from the historically low Euribor rate to which most Spanish mortgages are referred to plus a spread (diferencial). We had already anticipated last year in our post, Steep Drop in Euribor Translates into Cheaper Mortgages, that lower mortgage repayments were to be expected in 2009. Many borrowers which were gleefully expecting to lower their monthly mortgage repayments in 2009 have come to know and dread this obscure clause which was worded in their Mortgage Deeds unbeknownst to them.

We had criticised these clauses as being basically abusive to borrowers because they were one-sided. The public outcry has been echoed at last at the Senate this morning.

This initiative was fostered by Senator Mr Francisco Javier Vázquez who belongs to Spain’s Conservative party. The Senate has pleaded that these abusive clauses ought to be removed in compliance with Spain’s new law on Consumers’ Rights, Law 1/2007, which was enacted by the current Socialist Government.

It is estimated that this initiative, if upheld by Spain’s Socialist Government, would benefit an estimated two out three borrowers translating into cheapermortgage repayments.

Source: El Mundo daily newspaper.

Developer Aifos Announces it has Gone Into Voluntary Receivership

July 30th, 2009 @ 07:07 by lawbird

Rumours were confirmed last Wednesday 22nd of July when Aifos’ petition to file for receivership was formally accepted by Malaga’s Mercantile court number one. On the following day Aifos issued a press release by which it informed they had filed for voluntary receivership.

As we had previously pointed out in prior communications, filing for administration does not equate to bankruptcy as has mistakenly been reported at large e.g. In Spain’s highest profile administration procedure to date, involving well-known developer Martinsa-Fadesa, this company will restructure its 7 billion euro debt and will continue trading normally within the next years.

What developer Aifos has sought is for creditor protection allowing it to buy time to restructure its financial commitments. However, the mercantile judge ruling on the matter may ultimately decide at a later stage that Aifos should file for bankruptcy if it is deemed not to be able to continue trading. This will be decided upon in the ensuing procedure.

As from the time the official announcement is published in Spain’s Official Law Gazette (B.O.E.), creditors will have a deadline of one month to join Aifos’ Creditors list. (EDIT:  Today 31st of July it has been officially published)

Off plan purchasers may fall in any one of these three categories:

  1. Purchasers that signed a Private Purchase Contract and have not had their off plan dwelling delivered.
  2. Purchasers who had already withdrawn from their Private Purchase Contracts and had filed a lawsuit with no final ruling issued yet.
  3. Purchasers who had litigated already and had a final ruling on their case but had not been refunded yet.

As a general rule everyone who purchased a non-delivered property through developer Aifos, whether having litigated or not, should retain a lawyer (and court agent) to join the Creditors’ list and/or litigate. The difference between cases is on their rights (i.e. those with final rulings will be labelled as “ordinary” creditors which lands them higher above on the Creditors’ ladder). Notwithstanding the above, all three cases will be considered as non-secured creditors.

Purchasers will have to liaise with their existing legal representative or else appoint a solicitor to either join the Creditors’ list and/or litigate. Once the receivership has been accepted trials will now be heard only at Malaga’s Mercantile court number one unlike before in which it was actually Civil courts that passed judgement on cases involving Aifos.

Appointed lawyers will seek to best defend their client’s interests in the ensuing procedure taking the following actions amongst others:

  • Claiming from the judicial administrators the creditors’ position of the clients submitting all the necessary documents on time and in the due manner. To challenge adopted resolutions on the matter if proven detrimental to the inclusion in the Creditors’ List.
  • Continued monitoring of the receivership procedure ensuring client’s rights are upheld
  • To negotiate with the judicially-appointed administrators reaching agreements as necessary
  • To keep the client informed on the ongoing procedure
  • Assisting to Creditors’ meetings to defend the client’s interests
  • To claim or challenge judicially agreements taken by Malaga’s Mercantile Court

We will be sending this week to all our Aifos’ clients a detailed newsletter informing them of the legal situation and the available options available to them. This newsletter will also be available to non-clients upon request.

If you have purchased a non-delivered property through Aifos and wish to receive further information on this matter, please contact us free of compromise. One of our lawyers will contact you to explain clearly your legal options.

Email:  Contact Form
Phone: +34 952 86 18 90
Summer opening hours: Monday to Friday, from 8:00 till 15:00 hours

 
Featured Links: Apply for your Spanish NIE Number