Hello,
As you have mentioned, your CO statutes and regulations agreed that 2/5 would be enough to approve the installation of a service, Communal swimming pool in this case. This system differs from the one observed in the current Law of Horizontal Property, that is 3/5 ( article 17.1 ). There seems to be a confrontation between what has been stipulated in the statutes and the current Law, therefore we need to clarify if the rules to be applied are those approved in the statutes, internal operational rules or the current LPH.
Article 396 of the Civil Code, last paragraph indicates, in reference to Joint Property ( as your Horizontal Property is ), that the same are ruled by special legal dispositions and whatever it allows for, by the parties' will. On the other hand, we must regard Law on Horizontal Property as special Law, as determined by its article 1.1: " The present Law purports to govern the special system of ownership established in section 396 of the Civil Code, known as horizontal property." In section 17, paragraph 1 of the quoted article, it is established: " The resolutions of the owners’ general assembly shall be subject to the following rules ". The content does not offer any possibility for the parties to alter these rules set forth as being imperative.
As a consequence, we consider those regulations to be regarded void as not being in accordance with the Law stipulations in connection with the established quorum for the swimming pool installation, as it must be ruled by the 3/5 system established on the LPH, not having the community members any right to modify it, neither to extend nor limit the legal percentage.
Regards,
Bookmarks