Antonio Flores’ Blog

The Spanish Supreme Court has ruled that floor clauses can be deemed void where the bank failed to advise customers with clarity and transparency, establishing conversely that would be licit where borrowers were fully and adequately informed.

The high court analysed the clauses used by the bank BBVA and found them to be in breach of consumer regulations due to the following reasons:

• There is insufficient clear information that such clauses are material to the object of the contract.
• They were inserted together with “ceiling clauses”, which caps the loan interest rate, as if offered in exchange for the bank’s concession.
• The bank failed to offer examples on specific instances of interest rate behaviour.
• There is a lack of clear and comprehensible information in respect of cost comparisons with other loans offered by the lender -where there are others- or a warning that the borrower is not being offered others.
• In the case of BBVA, the clause is embedded within significant data that  disguises it and has the effect of diluting the attention of the consumer.

The Supreme Court has also found these clauses to have a perverse effect: they created the false appearance that the lower the Euribor, the lower the mortgage repayment (it was thus just an amiable facade).

Customers in the above scenario are now in a position to succesfully challenge such clauses although, as was made clear by the Supreme Court, the ruling does not have a retrospective effect.

Do you have one of such clauses in your mortgage loan contract? Have you calculated how much you could save by having it removed?

Antonio Flores Litigation, Mortgages, Property Abusive Clauses, BBVA, Caixa Nova Galicia, Cajas Rurales Reunidas, Floor Clauses, La Caixa, Santander, Spanish mortgage borrowers, spanish mortgages

After absorbing tens of thousands of properties through negotiation with defaulting borrowers, or via foreclosure proceedings, banks are now property-sicker than ever to take on anymore bricks and mortar that are less valuable than the loans registered against them.

When not being able to repay the loan and when such loan is well over the value of the property, one has to implement some creativity when attempting to convince the lender that they should book an appointment at the Notary Public to arrange the process of Dacion en Pago, where your loan is cancelled against transfer of title to the bank (or in plain English, handing over the keys to the bank), without going to Court.

Unfortunately, this is generally quite difficult to achieve, but where there is no other option, one has to press on. Here are a few tips, some of which I have borrowed from Manuel Gonzalez, a blogger expert in the matter :

1. Find ways to get rid of other assets you may have: Careful however, do it before you start defaulting as you could be accused of concealment of assets (alzamiento de bienes).
2. Stop paying: Some people like to think that by keeping up the repayments you are a more authoritative negotiator. Quite the contrary! If they see that you are repaying there is no need for them to waste their time with you.
3. Understand your enemy and know the way he thinks: Understand what is the reason for them not to be interested in keeping your property, and why that keenness in “screwing you”. So when approaching a bank manager or clerk, try to concentrate on attacking the lender as an entity, not the person individually, even if he was the guy who shook your hand when you first bought the property. These guys, understandably, will be following instructions, and so it will be better to befriend them, as they may be in your position tomorrow and could even share some tips with you.
4. Prepare your paperwork and check the value of the property for mortgage purposes, if it is equal or higher than the debt you have.
5. Approach the bank manager, and if possible, the area risk manager, and expose your predicament. Try to have empathy and expect and demand same, they could be sacked by close of business (day).
6. Have a formal notice sent to the bank: It is important the your meeting and your intentions are documented. A burofax is the preferred and cheaper method.
7. Persevere: You are already causing discomfort to the persons working in the branch and to the entity, which is very good. If you have the time try to pay them a visit every day or every other day, although always in a friendly manner. You will manage to stand out from the rest of dacion en pago pursuers and will come across as a man/woman on a mission.
8. If credible, advise them that you are leaving the country as you have managed to secure a 10 year contract as a dockmaster in Antananarivo port, Mauritania, or an equivalent extravagant location. Have your supporting paperwork ready, and if you don’t have it just make it up!
9. Don’t fall for the branch manager scaremongering tactics: Make sure that you show no emotions when they tell you that, if you stop paying, they will take you to court, and that your debt will exponentially grow with all those lawyers’ fees, arrears interest and costs, as bank managers are used to saying. Offer them a friendly grin and the shoulder shrug, which incidentally will also help you train your trapezius muscles. Also, don’t be so silly to wear your best suit and Italian shoes when meeting with the area risk manager. Smart but casual is the norm: sporting sandals, or flips flops, with socks, will do the job. I suggest something like this.
10. And finally, be ruthless, just like they are and have been with you since you first stepped into that branch.

Antonio Flores Mortgages, Property bank repossessions, dacion en pago, handing back the keys, spanish mortgages

Although selling a property without acceptance of the lender is considered to be, together with not paying the mortgage installments, a forceful reason for foreclosing, the reality is that, in these times of tight financing, it is being used an easy way for cheap and easy finance. How is this possible? I’ll show you below…

Article 118 of the Mortgage Act stipulates that a mortgage loan can be transferred provided the creditor has agreed to it, expressly or tacitly. In our case study (a client of our firm), the bank would have refused to approve the transfer because the property owner had obtained an 80% loan-to-value in 2006, and the valuation was now 25% less. As a result, the property was in some negative equity, the owner was desperate to get rid of the debt and the buyer wanted a 100% loan to value property.

So what did we do? We went straight to the Notary and signed the deeds of transfer with €0 payment. Previously, the buyer had opened an account with the lender and told them that, being a friend of the debtor (owner still at the time) he was going to start covering the mortgage repayments on his behalf, and instructed the lender to debit these from his account. Additionally, we took out a new insurance policy, through the bank, but in the name of the new owner. The idea behind this has been to force the bank to tacitly agree to the transfer of the loan, as they will have been inadvertently accepting repayments and issuing insurance policies in the name of the new owner, who will also have the deeds to his name, thus precluding them from opposing this de facto reality.

Although this is a very quick way to obtain 100% finance, it is risky because:

1. The lender could still foreclose on the property on the basis of its unauthorized transfer if they find out within a certain number of months; it is not clear how many months, but if nobody tells them, they will not find out. However, if they are getting religiously paid, it would be rather stupid to do so.
2. If the new buyer stops paying, the bank could still hold the previous owner liable, although it is possible to successfully argue that the bank tacitly consented to the transfer.

This ‘clandestine’ maneuver is useful when buyer and seller have certain trust in each other, and the owner’s desperation to sell is matched by buyer’s keenness on the property. Allowing principals of up to 100% of the property value, this is like a non-status mortgage on steroids!

Antonio Flores Mortgages, Property bank repossessions, foreclosure in spain, non status mortgages in spain, spanish mortgages

Everyone knows that a mortgage loan title deed is a lengthy document with elaborate legal clauses and complex formulas where the main conditions of the loan agreement are set out. What most people don’t know, however, is that banks tend to include restrictions as to what one can and cannot do with the property. The latter restrictions are what we are more interested in, because breaking them entitles the bank to cancel the loan agreement and request repayment of 100% of the remaining capital.

It has to be said that some of them are clearly abusive and would not withstand a legal challenge on application of the Consumer Protection Act, but going through some of the restrictions makes interesting reading if only to see how one-sided can banking contracts be.

We have used a standard mortgage loan contract, in this case from Caja Rural de Granada (savings bank), although they are all pretty much the same. As an example, this “Caja” can foreclose on the loan if:

1. You are late by 10 days in making a repayment (that’s ten days, never mind 6 months!).
2. You don’t pay the IBI (Council Tax) or Basura (Rubbish Collection Fee) receipts and insurance policies (IBI can be as low as €200s per year and Rubbish collection €40 per six months).
3. You don’t pay the Notary fees for the mortgage deed (possibly the daftest of them all when it is the banks who take the money from you, upfront, to pay for the Notary fees!).
4. You use the property for any other activity other than what has been agreed (any ideas? :)).
5. The property catches fire or is damaged and as a consequence it loses value (this could make sense but you have the bank forcing you take out insurance to cover this anyway).
6. You don’t give the bank the original mortgage deed within 6 months from signing the loan agreement (does anyone know where the original mortgage deed for their property is? From a legal point, it is completely irrelevant where the deeds are once they are registered so you can keep them in a safe, like some villagers do to get proper sleep, or use them to get the barbecue going, it really makes no difference).
7. You rent the property without prior consent of the bank and/or in detrimental conditions for the landlord (this clause is outright illegal and deserves no further comment).
8. You sell the property without the bank’s consent (they must first find out and then choose to add another property to their plentiful property portfolio!).

The notorious stupidity of some of the above clauses makes one laugh, but let’s look closely at what clause 8 entails. Recently I have been advising on some transactions on behalf of willing buyers and sellers without notifying the bank, because the bank has, quite simply, refused the buyer’s application on financial grounds. I will leave this for my next blog post.

Antonio Flores Mortgages bank repossessions, foreclosure in spain, spanish mortgage loan, spanish mortgages

When reading the pompously titled Royal Decree 1975/2008 (Spanish PDF) – Urgent Measures to be Implement in Respect of Economic, Fiscal, Labour and Access to Property Measures -, one thinks that we are opening a bag full of tax discounts and exemptions, job creation proposals and even formulas on how to bring in more business.

The reality is disappointing for when we look into these proposals only one really stands out of the crowd: the temporary and partial mortgage moratorium, limited to a maximum of 50% of the mortgage repayment (or €500) on a €170,000 mortgage, for unemployed at least since 3 months prior to applying for this help, whether salaried or self-employed and also, for the latter group, if they are earning less than approximately €1,500  in the last 3 months (or less than 3 times the minimum approved salary).

But if we then read carefully article 3 of the decree it states that “in any case the application of the measures herein contained will be subject to a prior agreement between the lender and the borrower”, which means that the above will be applied only if the bank wants to! And in anyone’s experience, how many times have we been offered help by a bank?

In summary, the Socialist Government is engaged in a superhuman effort to publish useless bits of legislation which are either always very difficult to benefit from because of the bureaucracy involved, are subject to third party agreement or simply are just not envisaged to save money (like this mortgage moratorium).

Zapatero has not realized yet that Spain was built on bricks and mortar and that he just cannot change the origin of the wealth and prosperity this country has enjoyed in the last 10 years. If he does want the economy to kick start again he better be thinking how to reduce the horrific taxes and costs associated with buying property (which in the worst case scenario go up to 11% of the purchase price) and then gradually try to base growth on a different economic model.

Antonio Flores Property spanish mortgage moratorium, spanish mortgages