






<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Non-Paying Tenants? No Longer an Issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://belegal.com/wordpress/non-paying-tenants-no-longer-an-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://belegal.com/wordpress/non-paying-tenants-no-longer-an-issue/</link>
	<description>Keeping up-to-date with Spanish Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:57:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierce</title>
		<link>http://belegal.com/wordpress/non-paying-tenants-no-longer-an-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-1530</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belegal.com/wordpress/?p=402#comment-1530</guid>
		<description>I have let my spanish apartment for 1 year which expires soon. I have notified the tenant but they claim that they have the right to stay for 5 years. The contract clearly stipulates the &quot;ONE YEAR&quot; term after which the tenant is required to vacate the property, and if both parties agree to extend the contract, then a new contract will be written. What is the point of the 1 year stipulation if the actual term is 5 years? Does the recent law amendment correct the situation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have let my spanish apartment for 1 year which expires soon. I have notified the tenant but they claim that they have the right to stay for 5 years. The contract clearly stipulates the &#8220;ONE YEAR&#8221; term after which the tenant is required to vacate the property, and if both parties agree to extend the contract, then a new contract will be written. What is the point of the 1 year stipulation if the actual term is 5 years? Does the recent law amendment correct the situation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Express Eviction Law Passed by Congress - The Lawbird Tribune</title>
		<link>http://belegal.com/wordpress/non-paying-tenants-no-longer-an-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-1200</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Express Eviction Law Passed by Congress - The Lawbird Tribune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belegal.com/wordpress/?p=402#comment-1200</guid>
		<description>[...] The Lawbird Tribune  Keeping up-to-date with Spanish Law     &#171; Non-Paying Tenants? No Longer an Issue [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Lawbird Tribune  Keeping up-to-date with Spanish Law     &laquo; Non-Paying Tenants? No Longer an Issue [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

