<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Antonio Flores’ Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores</link>
	<description>Thoughts about laws and regulations which affect foreigners in Spain </description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:37:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Corvera Golf and Country Club: Another Broken Promise by Julian</title>
		<link>http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/corvera-golf-and-country-club/comment-page-1/#comment-6286</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/?p=465#comment-6286</guid>
		<description>65% odds is very conservative. I&#039;m no lawyer, but in my opinion the chances of winning are no less than 99%! Look at the photos, they haven&#039;t built any of the advertised facilities! Just compare the site to that of the brochures!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>65% odds is very conservative. I&#8217;m no lawyer, but in my opinion the chances of winning are no less than 99%! Look at the photos, they haven&#8217;t built any of the advertised facilities! Just compare the site to that of the brochures!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Corvera Golf and Country Club: Another Broken Promise by aflores</title>
		<link>http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/corvera-golf-and-country-club/comment-page-1/#comment-6279</link>
		<dc:creator>aflores</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/?p=465#comment-6279</guid>
		<description>Dear Rick, 

My apologies, I mistakenly ommited on my post that although I did respect the opinion and frankness of J. Lambert I did not share his views at all because there is &lt;strong&gt;not one&lt;/strong&gt; facility built. In our case we decided to verify this by formally requesting Town Hall certificates and also by driving up to the complex, drawing up a legal report and taking photographs, which are to be published in a little while in this post. Finally, kindly note that we only take cases where the odds of winning are higher than 65/35 and to achieve this we submit in support of our claim every single document, photograph, report, newspaper article and witness statement we can get our hands on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Rick, </p>
<p>My apologies, I mistakenly ommited on my post that although I did respect the opinion and frankness of J. Lambert I did not share his views at all because there is <strong>not one</strong> facility built. In our case we decided to verify this by formally requesting Town Hall certificates and also by driving up to the complex, drawing up a legal report and taking photographs, which are to be published in a little while in this post. Finally, kindly note that we only take cases where the odds of winning are higher than 65/35 and to achieve this we submit in support of our claim every single document, photograph, report, newspaper article and witness statement we can get our hands on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Corvera Golf and Country Club: Another Broken Promise by KRW</title>
		<link>http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/corvera-golf-and-country-club/comment-page-1/#comment-6276</link>
		<dc:creator>KRW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/?p=465#comment-6276</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your response. As a buyer on Phase 2 who is taking legal action to recover my deposit I am reassured that you believe as we (and our lawyers) do, that we have grounds here for breach of contract. No doubt it will be a long and drawn out affair but I am prepared to be  patient and certainly not prepared to forgive them for the broken promises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your response. As a buyer on Phase 2 who is taking legal action to recover my deposit I am reassured that you believe as we (and our lawyers) do, that we have grounds here for breach of contract. No doubt it will be a long and drawn out affair but I am prepared to be  patient and certainly not prepared to forgive them for the broken promises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Corvera Golf and Country Club: Another Broken Promise by RIP</title>
		<link>http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/corvera-golf-and-country-club/comment-page-1/#comment-6272</link>
		<dc:creator>RIP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/?p=465#comment-6272</guid>
		<description>We (and 100 others) were with the above solicitior &quot;J.Lambert&quot; and felt very let down by his total &quot;U turn&quot; after representing us for 12 months. We are now seeking a new legal team to fight this case, having read your other blog regarding this case, I am suprised at your U turn, as you previously implied this case was hopeless. What has made your legal team now consider this case to be &quot;not reckless litigation&quot; as you have previously said. Have you been to the resort and have you gained 1st hand reports etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We (and 100 others) were with the above solicitior &#8220;J.Lambert&#8221; and felt very let down by his total &#8220;U turn&#8221; after representing us for 12 months. We are now seeking a new legal team to fight this case, having read your other blog regarding this case, I am suprised at your U turn, as you previously implied this case was hopeless. What has made your legal team now consider this case to be &#8220;not reckless litigation&#8221; as you have previously said. Have you been to the resort and have you gained 1st hand reports etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Corvera Golf and Country Club: Another Broken Promise by aflores</title>
		<link>http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/corvera-golf-and-country-club/comment-page-1/#comment-6263</link>
		<dc:creator>aflores</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/?p=465#comment-6263</guid>
		<description>The lack of facilities are not considered to be good cause for breach of contract by the previous lawyer dealing with the matter. Our litigation department has concluded that, contrary to his opinion (which we respect), there are sufficient grounds to uphold a contractual rescission for misrepresentation. This is more clearly seen on the photos I will post here which are part of the report we have drawn up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lack of facilities are not considered to be good cause for breach of contract by the previous lawyer dealing with the matter. Our litigation department has concluded that, contrary to his opinion (which we respect), there are sufficient grounds to uphold a contractual rescission for misrepresentation. This is more clearly seen on the photos I will post here which are part of the report we have drawn up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Corvera Golf and Country Club: Another Broken Promise by KRW</title>
		<link>http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/corvera-golf-and-country-club/comment-page-1/#comment-6251</link>
		<dc:creator>KRW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/?p=465#comment-6251</guid>
		<description>In which case why do you propose pursuing legal action for the two clients you mention in your blog if the lack of facilities are unlikely to be considered good cause for breach of contract?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In which case why do you propose pursuing legal action for the two clients you mention in your blog if the lack of facilities are unlikely to be considered good cause for breach of contract?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No Golf for Arenal Golf by darren jones</title>
		<link>http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/no-golf-for-arenal-golf/comment-page-1/#comment-6244</link>
		<dc:creator>darren jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/?p=382#comment-6244</guid>
		<description>i have just won a court case against arenal.but they have now appealed against the verdict.the case did not go to full trial as the judge gave his verdict from the evidence from the two sets of lawyers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have just won a court case against arenal.but they have now appealed against the verdict.the case did not go to full trial as the judge gave his verdict from the evidence from the two sets of lawyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Antonio Flores by darren jones</title>
		<link>http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/about-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6241</link>
		<dc:creator>darren jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marbella-lawyers.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/?page_id=2#comment-6241</guid>
		<description>do you own lawyers of spain.i am in a dispute with arenal golf and have just won the court case,but they have now appealed again the sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do you own lawyers of spain.i am in a dispute with arenal golf and have just won the court case,but they have now appealed again the sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Corvera Golf and Country Club: Another Broken Promise by aflores</title>
		<link>http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/corvera-golf-and-country-club/comment-page-1/#comment-6216</link>
		<dc:creator>aflores</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/?p=465#comment-6216</guid>
		<description>Having spoken to Jonathan Lambert, the lawyer previously dealing with a number of cases, we have been advised that his firm made the decision to not proceed with taking legal action because in his opinion the missing facilities would not be deemed to be, by the Murcia Courts, as fundamental breach of contract. Obviously we respect his opinion and frankness, &lt;strong&gt;but I don&#039;t share his views&lt;/strong&gt;. We are also advised that the developer has retained the services of Garrigues, the largest law firm in Spain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having spoken to Jonathan Lambert, the lawyer previously dealing with a number of cases, we have been advised that his firm made the decision to not proceed with taking legal action because in his opinion the missing facilities would not be deemed to be, by the Murcia Courts, as fundamental breach of contract. Obviously we respect his opinion and frankness, <strong>but I don&#8217;t share his views</strong>. We are also advised that the developer has retained the services of Garrigues, the largest law firm in Spain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Corvera Golf and Country Club: Another Broken Promise by aflores</title>
		<link>http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/corvera-golf-and-country-club/comment-page-1/#comment-6188</link>
		<dc:creator>aflores</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 07:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://belegal.com/blog-by-antonio-flores/?p=465#comment-6188</guid>
		<description>I don´t share your views that Town Halls are not interested in having 5 star hotels and other exclusive facilities, in my opinion it is the developers that happily (and recklessly) announce the construction of facilities that are either out of their financial reach or simply are more a dream than a reality. Court cases against developers in these instances are a necessity (being a lawyer this statement reeks of partiality, I am aware!) even if under threat of insolvency so as to strip them of the priviliges or impunity and inmunity. The duration of a case can range from 8 to 14 months or twice that duration if the cases are heard by a Mercantile Court (which happens when the developer goes into administration).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don´t share your views that Town Halls are not interested in having 5 star hotels and other exclusive facilities, in my opinion it is the developers that happily (and recklessly) announce the construction of facilities that are either out of their financial reach or simply are more a dream than a reality. Court cases against developers in these instances are a necessity (being a lawyer this statement reeks of partiality, I am aware!) even if under threat of insolvency so as to strip them of the priviliges or impunity and inmunity. The duration of a case can range from 8 to 14 months or twice that duration if the cases are heard by a Mercantile Court (which happens when the developer goes into administration).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
