With the advent of the crisis and the coffers of the Spanish Inland Revenue drying up fast, foreign property owners now seem to be the target of a renewed tax levy campaign, judging by the content of tax office letters received by a few clients. Because whereas before property owners that did had never paid Non-Residents Property Income Tax, an annual tax based on the ratable value (valor catastral), were deemed to be under the radar of the taxman, they are now being specifically pinpointed.

The letters sent by the Hacienda are not openly threatening, if that is possible at all, but a reminder that taxes have to be paid by virtue of owning a Spanish property. The written request states: “based on the information we hold, it appears that you have owned a property in Spain during the years 2008, 2009, [...], and, according to our records, you have failed to submit a tax return for Non-Residents Income or Wealth Tax“.

The letter then says that this is neither a tax request nor the commencement of an investigation. However, they seem to have all the information owners were hoping would not be picked up by the taxman, not until the property was sold (time when it would have had to be disclosed, and taxes paid up, if one wants to claim the 3% Capital Gains Tax retention back successfully).

This obviously does not affect tax-abiding property owners, who file they annual returns prior to the 31st of December of the following year (2010 tax is to be paid by the end of 2011), and are expected to pay an average of between €200 to €800, depending on size of property and the municipality; with larger villas paying substantially more. Resident property owners, on the other hand, are exempt from this tax.

Wealth Tax to be reintroduced in 2012

With effect as from 2011 and during the next year, property owners will be taxed again on Property Wealth Tax, having to submit the tax returns in 2012 and 2013, respectively. Residents for tax purposes will have tax breaks on their habitual home, up to a certain value, and an allowance of €700,000, which means that most Spanish residents will effectively be exempt from it.

Finally, nonpayment of due taxes will attract penalties, surcharges and interest and ultimately, a charge on the property so, to avoid unpleasant surprises, we suggest you act promptly by talking to a qualified professional.

If you have questions, you can read this FAQ about non residents tax in Spain.

Documents

• Non resident tax letter being sent by the taxman (PDF – 238Kb)

About to wind down for the weekend, yesterday evening I received an email from Alexandra Goss, personal finance reporter for the Sunday Times, in relation to a few enquiries sent by Spanish property buyers, and sellers, that were unexpectedly receiving letters from the Spanish tax office challenging the prices at which they had bought, and sold, their properties in Spain, respectively.

Indeed, one thing came to her mind considering the state the Socialist Government has left Spain in: the Spanish Tax Office (AEAT) is desperate for revenue and are finding avenues to levy extra demands for transfer tax from property buyers, and so, if the Spanish property market was not an already depressed sector of Spanish economy, they now come, as real predators, to make it even harder for people to buy, and sell.

This is the real paradox of it all: the Spanish Interior Minister flies out to England to do his silly property-selling road show, and in Spain, those buyers get shafted by the Inland Revenue his Government controls. The good thing? That courts are, mostly, not contaminated with the wrong ideology and will employ reasoning and logic to counteract this property-buying prevention scheme, and will mostly, again, throw out of court these extra tax demands.

What should one do if one receives one of these letters, after of course all the understandable cursing and imprecating? Well, go get a lawyer that knows his stuff and appeal within the stipulated timeframe, by choosing one of the 2 legally available avenues:

1. Challenge the “unreasoned”, “standardized” valuations made by the tax office that happen to be nothing else than some formulas being applied on unknown coefficients by a computer program that pumps out wholly impossible valuations (a 2-bedroom flat on a 200-unit empty development in Manilva worth €280,000?). The funny thing about this is that University graduates sign off these valuations, knowing that they are essentially wrong and untrue (land registrars in most of Andalusia are in charge of the Transfer Tax collection, and/or “arquitectos tecnicos” employed by the Andalusian Government, the same graduates that think that the property is twice as expensive!).This is what the courts in Spain think about these predatory extra tax demands:
   • Supreme Court 14^th December 1998: The valuation carried out by the architect for the Tax Office is a standardized printed form full of scant references that have the weight of an opinion rather than that of a property valuation, and therefore one cannot assume it has any reasoning or justifiable criteria, losing its legally binding effect.
   • Economical Administrative Tribunal 20-06-1995: The legal mandate granted to the Tax Office to raise supplementary tax demand fails due to the Tax Office not following a logical process when arriving at property values but rather by using abstract figures when calculating these. Also, the Tax Office fails to properly provide a valuation when they simply perform arithmetical calculations on the basis of a unitary basic module, without reasoning or justification, and certainly can never comply with the law when to this value or figure, a stereotyped all-purpose text is added on as reasoning. (Tantamount to calling the “arquitecto tecnico” a dumbass).
2. Carry out a proper valuation by a proper “arquitecto técnico”, or as they don’t like to be called, “aparejador”, who will surely determine that the property’s real value is either the price you paid for or sold it for, or perhaps less, and submit it, hoping that the “arquitecto tecnico” working for the Tax Office will abide by the norms of ethics of their profession and admit to being wrong. Because the funny thing here is that, depending on whether these university graduates work for you, or the Tax Office, their opinion of what the quoted property is worth will be €140,000 or €280,000, respectively. It´s funny, certainly, but it is also very worrying.

This subject matter is very very interesting, and so expect some interesting, and surprising, developments very soon, including a legal suit against the Andalusian Tax Office.

Anyhow, check tomorrow the Money Section in the Sunday Times, I am quoted there.

Offshore is definitely off. The times of the property owning offshore-based companies are over. The glamour associated with names such as Seychelles, British Virgin Islands, Turks & Caicos etc., has now turned into a stigma. Because there was a time in Spain when, if you went to certain summer cocktail parties or high-flying bashes and you did not own an offshore company based in some fanciful island, you were a nobody. In fact, your lawyer was quickly tagged as unsophisticated, uncreative, in essence, not up to scratch with this new posh trend that was all the rage among the richer.

The Mallorca Provincial Audience (May 2010) has sent a lawyer to jail for almost 4 years and given him a fine or €600K  for setting up a “fiscal engineering scheme to instrumentalise defrauding and money laundering procedures “, in the sale of a property in Puerto Pollensa (Mallorca). In this case, he had set up the structure to, among other aims, avoid (or rather evade) paying Capital Gains Tax (at 35%) on the real price (as opposed to the officially declared) when selling his client’s property.

According to the prosecutor, and the judge in the examined ruling, the investigated  law firm indiscriminately offered offshore companies, via the website offshore.biz site (in which even two Mallorca notaries were mentioned), to their clients with the intention of:

• Minimizing the tax almost to the point of exemption.
• Offering 100% protection to the assets.
• Offering 100% anonymity.

The message this Court ruling has sent out is a very clear one: using offshore companies to hold Spanish property does not entitle the beneficiary to legally avoid payment of taxes in Spain, whether you sell the shares, and alongside it, the property. This applies also to the buyer of the structure, who is not exempt from paying transfer taxes.

The Court Office, in reaching its decision, invoked the following:

• Non-Resident Act 5/2004: Capital Gain Taxes obtained, directly or indirectly, from property situated in Spain, will be taxed in Spain. In particular, the following gains are included: when they are originated or derived from rights or shares of a company, resident or not, which assets are made of up of, primarily, directly or indirectly, property based in Spain. The gains obtained from transferring the shares of a company, resident or otherwise, that attribute its ultimate owners the right of their enjoyment in Spain.
• Double Taxation Agreement between Spain and Ireland of the 18th of November 1986: the gains derived from the sale of property can be taxed where the property is located (for some reason, this was invoked as part of the defence strategy).

In this case, the tax office, assisted by the police, found enough evidence of the crime when they were given authorisation by the court to raid the firm’s premises, in which they found not only crucial information on the transaction (particularly deeds of share transfer and deeds of resignation of director and appointment of new director, both done on the day that the property changed hands, bank transfer slips, etc.) but also a private purchase contract for €875,000 for the property in question, when the price paid officially paid was €425,000.

Finally, the Tax Office’s report puts under serious scrutiny Law Firms that, apart from offering the standard juridical, financial and accounting services, have specialized in the design of schemes and structures of fiscal engineering that are utilized to defraud and launder money. These professional firms, which act as company incorporating agents, don’t have as its object international fiscal planning, but are purveyors of mechanisms for subjective simulation, by inserting physical and juridical persons, national and foreign, in the ownership of the assets they intend to conceal. The mechanisms, according to the Tax Office, are as follows:

1. Incorporation of offshore of property holding companies (offshore-based) .
2. Incorporation of Spanish Companies (mostly Limited-SRL), owned by the above offshore, to manage Spanish property. These companies are merely holding property, having scant bank movements.
3. Appointment of directors different from the ultimate owners, either being the same lawyers that created the structure or, as in the case study, someone paid to do the job (and who has also been sentenced to a jail term, albeit suspended). These persons are also authorised to operate both the offshore and the onshore accounts and are, at times, beggars pulled off the street. 
4. Utilization of the law firm’s clients account to receive and remit transfers, with the intention of a) concealing the true nature of the transactions behind the transfers and b) avoiding compliance with anti-money laundering provisions (thereby making it more difficult to know the real nature of the deal).

As a result of the above court action, the lawyer, the ultimate beneficiary and the director were all sentenced to jail terms, although only the lawyer will have to serve time, for the beneficiary paid up the taxes owed prior to the hearing (€135,000) as well as the fines, and the director was found guilty only of conspiracy to defraud.

Offshore is definitely off, and therefore it would be advisable that anyone willing to sell a property owned by a string of companies opted for not selling the shares abroad, because, not only all the above could easily be applicable, but also whoever was buying them would be buying into problem, unless of course he/she was sitting on a pile of cash he wanted to get rid of…(not advisable anyhow).

It may be interesting to see how this links with this new trend of incorporating UE based companies to avoid Spanish Inheritance Tax, particularly UK based, but will leave the study of this dubious proposal for a separate post.

It comes as no surprise that 30% of the enquiries we receive during a month relate to inheritance tax (IHT): there is an almost absolute ignorance about how much it is, when and where is it payable and how does one go about not paying, if at all possible.

IHT tax in Spain can span from nothing, if you inherit under a certain sum and are a Spanish resident to a whopping 81,6% if you inherit loads of money, you are also very well-off and you have no family ties with the testator. This is why it is important to know more or less what would the tax liability be for our inheritors should we pop our clogs within say 12 months (it makes a difference if one dies tomorrow as opposed to dying in say 20 years, particulary if you have a 20 year mortgage which by then would have been repaid).

To calculate quickly how much tax would our inheritors have to pay we could do with an IHT calculator and hopefully this will soon be an application on our website but meanwhile see below some examples on the tax liability if we were to inherit different value net assets (after mortgages, debts etc.):

(We are assuming, for the purposes of the above calculations, that the net values have already been reduced with the average legal allowance, approximately 15.000 Euros)

The following list is by no means complete, but mentios a few of the most common mistakes made by non-resident testators with regards to their Spanish property. I always recommend that people:

1. If you have already bought, don’t just transfer the property to your children (or designated inheritors)!: This seems quite obvious but still today many property owners believe they can do it lawfully and don’t realize that logic and common sense are up against them: how can children buy when they don’t have money?
2. Don’t panic and jump into equity realease programmes, foreign company incorporation scheme or other miraculous option. The reason for this is very simple: the suppliers of these products/services do this for a living which means that they will not wish that you opt for another IHT avoidance scheme, but only theirs. In short, they are not able to give you impartial advice. If you are not sure, try asking them…
3. Over a certain value, don’t buy in your own name: How much will have to be paid will depend on the value, whether you have a mortgage, the number of designated inheritors and the relationship with them or if these are residents for tax purposes.
4. Don’t reciprocally will the property between the spouses, if the ultimate heirs will be the children. This can raise the tax bill dramatically.
5. Don’t pass away without a will or just a foreign will and think a Spanish will is not needed. Any asset proprietor in Spain should arrange his post-death affairs in a neat way, inasmuch as the heirs would otherwise be involved in consuming and expensive legal procedures which would attract different legal jurisdictions. An experience not recommended by those who have experienced it.
6. Don’t use the services of the so called tax experts to draft a will.
7. Don’t attempt tax-evading tricks, especially if you don’t know the risks!

In the following days I will elaborate more on each of these points.

–

For those of you interested, on Tuesday September the 28th, I will be in the The Hannah Murray Show on Talk Radio Europe, discussing the inheritance issues that affect foreigners in Spain. You can tune in directly through their website (internet stream), or through the FM frequency assigned in your area.

Taxes are a funny thing. One day you get a registered letter, sent via the post office, with a on the spot demand for €2 surcharge, and another day Mr. Roca, the brains behind the biggest corruption ring ever to hit the headlines, faces an €800 million fine for, among other counts, Tax Fraud.

Whatever your problems with the Tax Office are, small or big, I find a very worrying pattern among some professionals in the real estate business: they are still providing tax advice to people buying real estate in Spain and the VAT refund they are supposedly entitled to if they buy through a company.This Costa del Sol legal/tax-gossip is all the more dangerous as it openly despises the complexities and sophistications of VAT tax provisions.

I am talking about advice relating to VAT refund when buying plots of land or property, and is no small talk if one considers that it accounts for 8% (or 18% on plots of land), but also if we think that it can make the difference between buying or walking out of the real estate’s office.

This inexpert advice is presumably given out innocently, but the excitement it creates is not nearly as exciting as the tax officers’ desire to quash the application and return a letter with a fine equating to 50% of the VAT amount trying to be recovered!

This “Sonderbehandlung”, or Special Treatment, is reserved by the VAT officials to those they deem are trying to cheat the Tax Office and so the matter demands some adjustment in perspective. But this is only one side of the (horror) story, because we could also find that having paid VAT, and having been entitled to a refund, the seller of the plot or property who charged us the tax is not a trader and therefore not only will we struggle to obtain a VAT refund but also we will have to pay Transfer tax on top of the VAT!

So as to not bore readers, I will succinctly explain 3 real life case scenarios:

1. A property holding company buys a plot at La Mairena, Ojen, from a legitimate land trader with a view to develop it and sell the finalized property. The buyer claims a VAT refund and receives, by way of return letter, a rejection to the application and a fine of 50% of the VAT that the unsuspecting applicant was after, because the Tax Office, in a display of extreme distrust, considers that the company was never intended to be used to carry out a commercial activity, but rather only as a means to apply and obtain the VAT refund, since the property, they contend, was to be used as living accommodation for the owner of the company. The Tax Office concludes that the property holding company has no other property, no prior experience in construction, no offices (either owned or rented), no employees, is not registered with the Tax Office with a specific “epigrafe” (which is a communication made with respect to the activity the company intends to do) and is not proven that the property was intended to be sold through real estate agents (this particular requirement was used, by a client of our firm, to demonstrate in extremis the genuineness of the claim).
2. An individual buys plot of land at La Quinta, Marbella, and pays VAT for it (16%, now 18%). Some weeks later the Regional Tax Office sends a tax demand for Transfer Tax for an additional 8%, as it is determined that the seller should have not sold with VAT because he is not a property or land developing professional, in fact has, objectively, no business organization as such, and, consequently, the deal is subject to Transfer Tax and not VAT. Connected to the above is the situation whereby the buyer is a proper trader, buys with VAT and intends to claim it back. His surprise is massive when he is told he does not have an entitlement to a VAT refund but he stills has to pay Transfer Tax.
3. An import-export company based in Torremolinos buys a new flat and tries to shave off the VAT paid, alleging that the apartment is being used by the company to carry out its activity. Input VAT is deducted, but 1 year later a letter arrives indicating that application for a VAT refund was made irregularly and it has to be repaid. Applying the Lennartz UE doctrine, the applicant manages to keep 50% of the tax arguing that 50% of the apartment is used for business office purposes and the other 50% for private living purposes.

VAT is a complex tax and is the most visible example of the permanent war between the Spanish Inland Revenue and tax payers that merits an abrupt treatment, inspired by distrust, of the former on the latter. But also, VAT is the Inland Revenue’s obsession so careful when dealing with it.

A recent report by the Association of Tax Inspectors in respect of rental income highlighted what we all knew: that very few landlords do actually declare any rental income. According to the inspectors, the biggest tax evaders are in Andalucía, where it is believed that only 26% of property owners declare this income to the Spanish Inland Revenue (of which, ostensibly, foreigners amount to…0 percent!). In total, €2,450 million of lost tax revenue.

It is not clear however how have they reached these conclusions but one thing is clear to me: I don’t know of anyone on the Costa del Sol (mostly foreigners) who has ever asked where should they pay their taxes.

The reasons, below:

1. Unwillingness to pay taxes (obvious).
2. Untraceability of the transaction as most of the deals are done in cash or are paid into non-resident bank accounts, of little interest to the Spanish Inland Revenue. Also, the sums are small and periodical so banks are not obliged to report back to the Central Bank of Spain.
3. Tenants are not obliged to withhold the tax and lodge with the Spanish Inland Revenue if the tenancy agreement is not of a commercial nature (Conversely, where a real estate agency is involved in the payments they will have to deduct the 24%).
4. Ignorance as to how to about paying the tax in the case of a non-resident.
5. In the event of willingness to pay, many non-resident owners are put off by the tax (24%), with no possibility to deduct costs (maintenance, etc.)
6. Lack of fear of the Spanish Inland Revenue.

But this blissful scenario is likely to change because the Spanish Inland Revenue is on a mission to trap tax dues with a clever and original proposal. They will force utility companies (water, electricity, gas) to supply details of consumption to identify the properties which are apparently empty but house a tenant in them.

This seems once again a futile attempt to convince owners that they need to pay taxes and judging by how it is released it looks more of a newsletter or circular carrying a declaration of intention, no more.

Living in Spain as a resident has become a rarity among Spanish elite sports professionals. This includes Fernando Alonso, Sergio Garcia and Jorge Lorenzo, among others, who have their residence in tax havens such as Switzerland. Rafa Nadal and Alberto Contador (2-time Tour the France winner) on the contrary feel that paying taxes in Spain is a moral obligation.

The Spanish Inland Revenue and a couple of smaller political parties want to stop them from representing Spain internationally.They had already tried to implement this law some month ago but was it thrown out.

“Social scourge”, “tax cheaters”, “lacking in solidarity”, “miserable compatriots” are just some of the adjectives used to define these sports stars who could, if a law proposal succeeds, stop performing for Spain in future. But when is a person considered to be a resident in Spain for tax purpose and how can the tax office invoke residency of a certain individual in Spain so that he is forced to pay taxes on world-wide income? As with many other countries, any person staying in Spain for more than 183 days in a fiscal year (ending 31st Dec.) will be deemed a resident for tax purposes and is obliged to submit a tax return on world wide income. Unlike the UK, the 90-day rule does not apply in Spain but on the contrary other points of connection with the latter country do apply. To make it simple, the criteria used is one the following:

1. Spending more than 183 days per tax year.
2. Having the main center of its activities or economical interests, directly or indirectly, in Spain.
3. For companies, having most of the assets, directly or indirectly, in Spain or when the primary activity is carried out, as well as having the management centers, in Spain.

Nowadays it is extremely complex for the Spanish Inland Revenue (and presumably for other Tax Offices in the EU) to determine when is a person resident in Spain for the simple reason that passports don’t get stamped any longer. But if someone gets a letter from the Inland Revenue saying that they have detected that he/she is a resident for tax purposes and request payment of taxes on worldwide income the onus of proof falls on the tax subject. Showing water and electricity bills of a property in a third country is no longer a valid excuse for the Spanish Inland Revenue which has now increased the proof of residency by demanding a Certificate of Residency issued by the tax authorities of the third country, provided this country is not classed as a tax haven and that it has some form of tax information exchange agreement.

Where this third country is a tax haven the Spanish Inland Revenue will only let the tax suspect off the hook if he/she can prove that they are effectively spending more than 183 days per year in this country. The reason is that foreign taxpayers are being issued with what they consider as a “passive residents card” which does not oblige them to declare any income nor, ultimately, pay any taxes (normally only a small investment easy to comply with, such as lodging a few tens of thousands of Euros in a bank account or buying an apartment).

If the Spanish Inland Revenue and the Catalan Party CIU (Convergencia I Unio) can convince the Spanish parliament that fellow compatriots dodging taxes is immoral and that consequently they are to be stripped of the Spanish flag on their endorsements we may soon see Fernando Alonso and Sergio Garcia racing and hitting balls, respectively, for Switzerland, Lorenzo riding for Andorra or Pedrosa also riding but for England, leaving the poor(er) Nadal and Contador the burden of…building roads and council tennis courts for their beloved fellow compatriots.

Contrary to what has been divulged by some, Property Income Tax (PIT) for 2008 will not have to be paid in June but prior to the 31st of December, as has been the case in previous years. Property Wealth Tax (PWT) has now been abolished and will not have to be paid alongside PIT.

PIT will also be calculated in the same manner as before, that is, by applying 2% to ratable value (or 1.1% if it this value has been revised after 1994) and applying a 24% on the resulting amount. Form 214 is no longer used, and instead Property Income Tax will have to be filed using Modelo 210.

If the property is being let (and the income declared to the authorities!), Property Income Tax is not applicable and if it is only let for part of the year, the tax is only applicable for the part of the year that the property is vacant from tenants. In this case the income is taxed at a flat rate of 24%, without possible deductions.

The elimination of PWT by the Spanish Government was a consequence of the economical crisis and seen as a measure to boost foreign investment. The reality is that very few investors get to know that this tax ever exist prior to deciding to purchase a property and even if they had known it was still applicable it is doubtful that it would have had any influence on the decision to purchase property. In any event the elimination of PWT has been welcomed by owners.

Property owners who have bought a property through a foreign company will need to provide a certificate from the Tax Office in the country of domicile proving fiscal residency of the company and shareholders in a country with a Double Taxation Agreement (all UE countries are), in order to avoid the Special Tax on Foreign Companies, currently at 3% of the ratable value. We will provide assistance in this matter. Property owners who have bought through a Spanish company are exempt from payment of taxes for owning property.

As in previous years, from Lawyers of Spain we will be offering the Fiscal Representation Service to all our clients as from September. The service includes not only the calculation of the taxes and filing of the forms and payment of tax due but also acting a fiscal representative for the duration of the fiscal year (calendar year), notification of any communication from the Spanish Tax Office in relation to the tax and free consultations in respect of any tax matter.

Spanish tax law is slow to keep up with the new times and so when buying (and selling) at discounted prices, a common occurrence these days, it may well happen that in 6 months from completion we receive a letter from the tax office asking us to pay more tax.

This is exactly what happened to a client who approached us after purchasing a property in Benahavis for €250,000, when he was sent the letter asking him to pay an extra €3,850, on account of Transfer Tax (7%) on €305,000 which is the value property should have, according to the tax office.

Why does this happen? Well, the regional Tax Offices in charge of transfer taxes uses a calculator which tells us what the minimum value each property should be sold at and therefore, if any property is sold under this value they will recalculate our tax declaration and will request that we pay the balance, using the property which has been bought as a guarantee of payment (a charge is immediately placed in the land registry).

Possible scenarios and options:

• What can be done before you buy? If you are buying a property at a discounted price we suggest that the minimum value is known prior to entering into negotiations with a seller and if there is a likelihood that the tax will be more then use when negotiating a price, to your advantage. So if you want to know what is the assessed value for tax purposes of a property in Andalusia, according to the Tax Office, you can do so by using this calculator (note that although an accurate calculation it is not legally binding).
• And if you have already bought and receive the letter…? If it was already known and made part of the deal then it gets paid, but if we receive the letter “out of the blue” (because we never suspected it could happen) then it can either be paid or appealed, a process likely to run into a 2 year period (but nowadays they can be won as judges consider that a calculator is no substitute to a proper valuation to be carried out in situ).
• And what if we are selling? This is a more complex case as the tax office in charge of capital gains tax (CGT) is the national AEAT, which does not use the above calculator but does actually send over property valuers. If this is the case, of which our firm has had very few in the last seven years, we will analyze the facts and merits of the case and advise on what the best course of action is. In one case we had our client had sold cheap (€350,000) because he had personal financial matters to resolve and soon after selling he left the country with the proceeds (very small, incidentally), so we have not heard more from the AEAT Tax Office who reported the real value to be of €450,000. Again, an appeal here is also an option.

If you want to avoid surprises it is possible to apply for a legally binding value report, whether you are buying or selling, which your lawyer can apply and obtain for you.

Some of you may have been advised by your bank that you need to provide them with a non-resident certificate or have the account frozen. The measure is still confusing as different lenders are applying existing legislation (a mixture of 1991, 1997 and 2007 sets of regulations) differently and whilst some are requesting the certificate electronically, from the appropriate government offices (at a charge of around 15 to 20 Euros), every year, others have requested that the bank account holder provides a hard copy obtained at the Police Station within 15 days from being notified failing which their bank account will be frozen. In these cases the certificate is valid for 2 years after which date the bank will request it electronically.

It does seem however that with the inevitable tightening of money laundering controls all banks and savings banks will eventually request it and therefore it may be wise to apply for a hard copy and send it to the bank.